Sunday, January 31, 2010

"Heat" and "Blowpop:" No Review...Yet.

I know I promised a review about "Heat" and "Blowpop." I had one all written just on "Heat," but I felt like I should wait until I attended a "Blowpop" party hosted at the club. It seemed as if a lot of the buzz around "Heat" was intertwined with the Ry N Sky "Blowpop" promotion, almost like one big package, so I thought that would be appropriate. I can report that I went to the soft-opening on New Years Eve. I also went to the packed grand opening on Friday. And I did go to the "Blowpop" party on Saturday. But...

I'm still going to hold off on a review for a little while longer. Not that anyone cares what I think in the first place, of course - or reads this blog. :) But the club and party seem like they might need more time to develop and promote to reach their full potential. Totally understandable, right? And I really hope they do reach that point - because gay Pittsburgh really does seem like it wants and needs a fun, lively, upscale place to dance.

So, until then, I offer this:



I like to think of myself as the kid hamming it up next to Sinatra, and that's the rest of us 'Burgh homos just a singin'! Enjoy!

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Combined: I'm Just Sayin', with Shameless and Wanton Naked Picture

Okay, so I think Nick Jonas is cute - but he's total jailbait and therefore I have no interest. So the shameless naked picture is not of him, and if you thought it was, shame on you - and stay away from playgrounds.

Instead, the shameless picture is of Pittsburgh Penguins hockey player Sidney Crosby - who definitely is NOT underage. He's quite within bounds, and if any of you happen to have his home address, I'd love to send him an FTD cookie basket to say "hullo."

But, while looking at Sidney, I couldn't help but notice some similarities between him and Nick. Take a look.





Do you see it? Or am I just dreaming a confusing and sick dream? I hope the former, because I am a complete law-abiding citizen and I would never do anything so untoward.

Going to "Heat" with "Blowpop" tonight - expect review tomorrow.

So, I had a blog post all ready to go on "Heat" but I've held it in "save mode" until I go to "Blowpop" tonight. I want to get the full picture of what's going on with this dual relationship down on Pittsburgh's Strip.

Expect a post tomorrow.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

The Rules Before The Relationship

Around this time of year, people really start acting a fool when it comes to guys, dating, and relationships. The spectre of Valentine’s Day, I suppose. Personally, my drive toward any of the three is at an all-time low – and I feel released from their pursuit. I couldn’t tell you where this psychic release came from. It could be the resolution of some long-standing family issues; or that I have a lot of interesting things going on in my life that are keeping my attention. It’s also possible that nothing jumps out at me as either terribly impressive or a good fit for me, in terms of dating or men. My sex drive has even waned a bit – just a bit – as a result. I just don’t see a point in pursuing it if it’s going to be mediocre or ordinary. Whatever the circumstances which have brought me to this state of mind, I feel as if I’ve transcended to the point where I’m pleased to leave it all behind.

At this moment, I’d rather focus on work and school, spending time with friends, and doing those unique things I enjoy on an individual basis. I have a number of intellectual, spiritual, and physical pursuits I have re-embraced. I certainly enjoy the freedom of using time as I see fit or spending money with little thought to the needs of others. Indeed, I’ve even been known to waste a little of both time and money on myself lately. One may call this self-centered, but I’d rather look at it like this: “making a long term commitment of time, energy, and funds in someone I feel a total rapport and love for - me.” It feels wonderful to just focus on what I really want for a change. I don’t want to end this commitment anytime soon, and I feel very happy about that. It’s quite a blissful state of being.

In all this, a new perspective has occurred to me that I thought I would share. In my bliss and transcendence, an odd kind of societal separation has allowed me to look at what I believe the normative view on guys, dating, and relationships is – and tease out some good and bad practices from that. Some of these views I have held for awhile, while others just recently occurred to me; all came together just recently. I standardized and cutely named them “The Rules Before The Relationship.” Of course, I’m no expert on love, dating, or sex – these are just observations and musings. If you’re not completely annoyed with me yet, I invite you to read on.


"The Rules Before The Relationship."

1. Don’t be needy or desperate.

Human beings just don’t respond well to stifling need or desperation. It signals the introduction of added stress to our own lives when someone we’re involved with can’t take care of either, and human nature is to conserve energy and reduce stress. So we don’t like either, and have a tendency to keep such people away. Plus, it's not a very attractive quality; we appreciate strength most of the time and weakness only when necessary. We often know we are being needy and acting desperate with someone, because find ourselves trying too hard. We make one too many phone calls or text messages. We even have a few moments where we think we should stop, but we're so caught up in fulfilling our emotional pit we keep going. But a lot of us then rationalize our overwhelming behavior, thinking that if the person wanted us to stop they would tell us.

So, STOP. Never get to the point where someone has to tell you to stop an otherwise positive behavior because you're overdoing it. If you get that feeling you're overdoing it, that's the moment you need to put the phone down and give it a rest for awhile.

Word of warning, though: there exist those who disguise need or desperation by being “too nice,” “too understanding,” and “too eager.” These "sensitive" guys cry foul when they are quickly ditched or taken advantage of. But to those people: quit playing the martyr role and get real about your neediness and desperation, too. In this case, it leads to the "need to please" - which also stinks of a lack of self-respect. It is entirely possible to be strong and sensitive at the same time, but this is not the path to do so.

To combat this, don’t sacrifice your needs and wants for another person’s until you’re in a committed relationship. If your lives don’t match up – or they aren’t willing to compromise without pushing, cajoling, or a fight – drop it. Whatever the cause, their lack of compatibility or flexibility doesn’t allow for more than a passing fancy. In addition, consider spending time figuring out where your need and desperation come from and resolving that, or the issues may play major parts in your relationships throughout your life.

2. Listen to what he is telling you directly.

If he is telling you something serious about his philosophy on life, the future, or relationships, it means he took the time to think and concretize it to the point of being able to verbalize it to you. And for men, this is something rare. Whether he actually lives that way or just talks a good game, it probably represents what he idealizes and what he wishes his life were about.

Can you flow with what he’s saying? If not, don’t change or compromise, or convince yourself he can be changed – because that requires a shift in core values and personality that will likely never hold and lead to frustration. However, if you have flow with him…

3. …then do your homework.

What are the red flags? What are the issues of friction that pop up? Are there things about the person you just can’t compromise on or accept? People usually put their best face forward at the beginning without knowing it. So listen closely for the little things they say or the slips of the tongue, watch how they present themselves in public, and observe how they behave with their friends. There are hints to be gathered throughout these “social testing” situations. Take them seriously.

4. Stay in the moment and limit preconceptions.

Be unabashedly you, so the person can get a feel for you. In return, enjoy learning about the person in front of you in the here and now, doing whatever activities you both enjoy. Take pleasure in whatever the extent of your interactions, whether they comprise your first meeting or first anniversary together.

5. Severely restrict asking where the relationship is going; instead, take your cues from the signals you receive.

If there is something new you want in the relationship – a kiss, sex, date exclusively, and so on – look for cues. If notice positive ones, send out some artful and reserved cues of your own. If they are well received, then go for the next step. Only ask where the relationship is going if you're ready to commit to something long-term and monogamous, and you strongly suspect they are as well.

Also, severely limit expectations and thoughts for the far-off future, especially early on. Instead, reserve that for after the rare occasion you both agree to enter a long-term monogamous relationship, then have to decide on buying a house, having kids, and joint funeral plots. But not before. It’s a waste of time, puts pressure on the relationship to leave up to expectations, and makes the relationship a huge downer if the future plans don’t materialize – as they often don’t.

6. Certainly don’t dwell on the past.

Life’s past wrongs and relationships do leave marks, but informing a person about bad life circumstances and patterns from old relationships won’t prevent the same things from happening again. And depending on the other person or the relationship, it could just make you a target for the same or similar patterns to repeat. So keep the past to yourself unless it becomes necessary or proper to share it. The rule here? Have fun instead!

7. If you can’t prevent yourself from dwelling on the past, work on whatever issues are preventing you from doing so before looking for new dating relationships.

New relationships, if they go wrong, can create new mental wounds – or exacerbate old ones you don’t allow to heal first. These multiple open wounds can come together to complicate other areas of your life besides dating, with unwanted results – including negative personality shifts, unwanted social phobias, depression, anxiety, and substance abuse and other addictions. Perhaps most importantly, these issues can unknowingly influence your attitudes about dating and relationships, helping to establish negative patterns and alter existing and good ones for the worse. Work on your issues before moving on to someone else, for your own sake and theirs.

8. Create an honest, understanding, and respectful atmosphere from the start.

If you get the feeling they aren’t into it anymore, let them know that if it’s not working out for them, you’re approachable and they can just say so. State clearly that you won’t freak out or do anything rash. If they decide they want to move on, let them go without a fuss. Do not break into their house and their clothes out a window of any sort, and do not send 16 pizzas to their house on a lonely Saturday night.

On the flipside, don’t beg them to reconsider. Never say “I’ll do anything,” and don’t offer to change. Why? See rule number 1. The relationship is over. All your neediness will do is push a relationship coming to an inevitable close towards a more uncomfortable end, and possibly tarnishing your public reputation and self-image to boot. Remember: this person has friends, and they could start talking about YOU. Chances are, they already were before the relationship ended and it will only intensify for a short period. Don't give them fodder.

9. On the same note, be willing to tell the person it’s not working out or you’re not interested, regardless of how they may react. Hopefully, they will be classy about the situation and respond positively and respectfully, and you can maintain whatever type of relationship you both agree is best.

If not, and things turn negative or creepy, end it quickly and respectfully – and then don’t look back. Their anger may be inflamed, and if they are not in control of their behavior and actions, can lead to cover, overt, or indirect retaliation that you don’t need in your life. A quick and firm ending without drama on your part will help reduce this. If all goes well, none of your clothes will be thrown out a window and you will receive no falsely ordered pizzas on a Saturday evening. Or, at least, much less of both than normal.

10. Whatever you do, don't ask or answer the "what's wrong with me/him" question.

This rule is, perhaps, the most important rule of all. Occasionally, you may come across someone who wants to do a post-mortem on the relationship, date, or what have you. It's not enough that it's over; he has to know "Why? What's wrong with me?" He believes that he is the cause. Furthermore, he won't stop hounding you until you tell him, and he promises he won't be upset.

That's a lie. He will be upset, and your answer will extend his bad feelings by several years, and increase his blood pressure by several points. It will also make it more likely that the response he requested will be twisted into this malicious retelling to all his friend, "and out of the blue, he called me (insert characteristic here)." And your clothes will end up out a window, and you will still end up with pizzas - random ones delivered to your door for several years perhaps.

So practice this response, and then say it firmly: "I don't think anything good can come of that, and I don't think I'm the person who should point out your flaws. That's really something you should ask of your friends and family. And please don't ask me again, or I'll have to leave." And if he asks again, don't play into it - leave.

The person asking already has a good idea of his flaws, and doesn't need you to tell them. He likely has issues with self-acceptance, and is just going to use your break-up coupled with your criticism as outside evidence that he is "not being good enough". For some, this might spur positive change, but for many it makes the person feel marginalized and unacceptable - even if the "flaw" is just a matter of personal taste on your part.

If you find yourself on the receiving end of this treatment, end it quickly. If you are the one giving it, cut yourself (and him) a break. The last thing you need to hear from someone who just broke up with you is the answer to "what's wrong with me?" Besides, you likely know your own flaws. Asking these questions to which you are not prepared for the answers are just going to make you feel worse about yourself - and that goes to the heart of the real problem: your self-esteem. So, be kind to yourself, and don't ask.

11. Finally, if you have difficulty maintaining a friendship or gracious acquaintanceship, begin to change or lessen your interactions with that person until you are able.

Be willing to eliminate direct interaction altogether. In addition, consider discarding items that remind you of him in order to move past the situation – this may includes phone numbers, articles of clothing, pictures, and the like. If the person is a friend on a social networking site like Facebook or MySpace, consider “de-friending” to prevent yourself from sending or receiving a constant flow of information about each other’s life – and new relationships. These may not be necessary, but if you are having difficulty ending the association, it may be necessary.

Whatever you do, if you are experiencing difficulty moving past the relationship, do not contact the person. Instead, take some time – alone – to review the relationship, develop your own understanding, and put it into perspective for the future. After awhile, you should be able to move on.

---END RULES---

No matter what happens in life, you’ll always have yourself. No one will ever understand you or know your needs as well as you do for yourself – no matter how romantic humanity’s poets have gotten about love’s ability to create “mind-reading” and “soul-sharing.” Simply put, because we are all unique individuals, what we experience in life and how our minds perceive those events are just as individual. And without some way to directly view the content's of one's mind, these thoughts are unknowable.

Further, anything even approaching that level of deep communication and interdependency takes a lot of hard work. The majority of guys, dating, and relationships we’ll experience in our lives simply cannot be worth that level of energy or frustration we might invest. And, though difficult for some to accept, for the vast majority of us no man will ever rise to that level.

Of course, we would be exhausted if we invested fully in all the guys we found attractive in our lifetimes. But most of us will never find out anyway, as we aren’t ready or willing to invest that kind of energy and hard work in dating or relationships, and we may never be. What’s more, we have to start knowing that about ourselves so as to reduce the negative impact of romantic waywardness on ourselves and others.

I firmly believe a more balanced and pragmatic approach to dating and men could help everyone, and that is why I have offered “The Rules Before The Relationship” that you see above. These are not the rules that I have necessarily followed, nor are they the ones I ascribe to. But they are essentially just "good ideas" that from my perspective outside the dating game seem overlooked, ignored, or forgotten. In some cases, because we're often caught up in the drama of our social world without thinking about our behavior, perhaps these are ideas that some of us never come to realize. In essence, they just seem like good “rules of the road” worth sharing.

In closing, and in the spirit of these rules, I implore you: keep it cool and keep it rational. Keep your eyes open and keep two feet on the ground. And, above all else, be willing to be let go and be alone. Alone is how you came in this world and quite possibly how you will go out. Besides, a poor relationship with someone you aren’t compatible with is no substitute for integrity, inner peace, and tranquility with yourself. On face validity, that is an idea we should all be able to accept and appreciate.

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Gay date event 3

Krystal's parking fail. She parked next to a Cadillac, so you know the 85 year old man next to her will smack her door. Parking fail = door dent.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

Gay date event number two.

Does Krystal look over 18? No? Because I don't. I got carded for seeing "Up In The Air," and she didn't. At the movies. Really.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

Krystal and I on our gay date.

So, our date begins with a trek to the AMC Loew's theatre, parked a mile away. It's Saturday, and we need our exercise anyway.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

My friend Derek says...

I have to post pictures of hot guys on my blog to get anyone to read it. So, here ya go:



I think he's hot. Anyone reading yet? Hellooo? Fudge.

Friday, January 22, 2010

Okay, I'm just sayin'...

Anyone notice that Clay Aiken could be Barry Manilow's love child?




I'm just sayin'.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Word of the Day: Elucidating

Word of the Day: Elucidating. To clarify: make clear and (more) comprehensible; "clarify the mystery surrounding her death". "I'm elucidating the reasons why Jay Leno is a douchebag." - David Letterman.

This guy...

...had his pants pulled up so high, that..(finish this sentence).
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

Great Moments in the History of Duh

I'm sitting here with my friend Krystal, who just elucidated all of the Petersen Events Center with her wisdom. To wit, she said:

"Gay men are so petty. They are even worse than girls."

A duhhhhhh.

This has been a "Great Moment in the History of Duh."

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

When do YOU hit your "X"?

Facebook is both a blessing and a curse. I must admit that ever since my ex-boyfriend "Sluggo" and his friends shamed me into joining, my social life and social circle has been easier to manage. But the online world holds special challenges for a social doofus such as myself. And, speaking of how I don't know what to say or do sometimes, here is where Facebook becomes a curse. What do you do when there are people on your Facebook and you aren't sure you know then personally? Lately, people have been pointing to Facebook to show their face pictures and other information so I can get a better look at them. In order for me to get a better look, I have to add them as friends. Of course, I don't immediately drop them as friends, because that would be rude - right? Or is it expected that I'll look, and then de-friend them immediately? Someone have the rulebook on this one?

Then there are those people who add you as friends once you have enough of THEIR friends as your friends. Hard to follow? Let me help. Let's say that some random clicks on my profile from one of their friend's pages. It shows that I'm friends with, say, 30 of his friends. That person says "Oh, wonder why I'm not friends with him in real life?" So, instead of waiting to meet me in real life, he becomes friends with me on Facebook first. Me, seeing that he has 30 friends in common? How can I say no? What if he bad mouths me? And what if I do meet him after saying no? Our entire basis for a real life friendship is ruined.

Side note: this person may actually never meet me or become friends with me in real life, by the way. Our entire interaction in the course of human existence may be limited to the online world, his friend request, and me saying "yes" or "no." After that, I doubt I'll hear from him again. I mean, what IS that??!?

In addition, there are people that I meet through the course of going out. Apparently, I either meet them and add them via Facebook Mobile while I'm standing in front of them, or search them later when I get home. Now, I'm not saying that I've been inebriated while I've added some of these people - but if there was a list of possibilities, that selection might have statistical significance. In some cases, I'm just forgetful and (as mentioned before) a social retard. So, a few weeks later, I'm getting Facebook Newsfeed from some person, and I'm laughing and thinking "wow, this guy is funny!" And then it hits me: "Who the hell is that?"

In all situations, it's even worse when you look at the pictures and think: "he looks vaguely familiar." Looking through someone's Facebook pictures when you don't really know them is not a good reintroduction. You seem someone holding a baby and smiling one minute, and the next you see them puking in a trashcan wearing a silk teddy. (And, btw, some of ya'll really shouldn't allow these pictures on your Facebook. There is a de-link option, and you should use it. Heart.)

So I look through his shared friends list, and we have some friends in common, but they are scattered from all corners of my social circle. It's even worse when we have only one friend in common. It's absolute death when we have none. Because then I can't place WHERE I may have met him. Was it the bar? Was it school? Was it a class? Was it on a certain gay man's site that shall remain nameless? What the heck was it?!? And what do I DO?

Now you're saying "why don't you just message them and ask?" Well, I'll tell you why. Ever send a text to a number in your phone and you don't know who it is? Ever get into a bitch session for 0.10 a text? I have. While some people are very cool about reminding you where you met, and others will admit that they don't remember themselves, there are a select few that treat this as if you are showering hot acid on their heart and they are innocent bunny rabbits of love who are horribly hurt and demeaned. But then the bunny rabbits of love turn into psycho firebunnies of death, with sharp pointy teeth of metaphorical weapons.

"LOL I can't believe you don't remember who I am!," he or she says.

"I'm sorry, it's been awhile since we (texted, messaged, IM'd). Can you remind me?" I say.

"OMG you're such a fucking loser. Don't you remember? We chatted for like an hour!"

"Can you give me more to go on? Do you have a picture maybe? I'm good with pictures."

"I'm not giving you a picture if you can't even remember who I am. Fuck off."

This is an amalgamation of all the text and IM conversations of this type that I have had ever since "technology has brought us all closer together." It happens more often than you'd think.

I guess, in such situations, you really find out how people are...even when you don't know them. So, I am somewhat thankful. After such a glowing conversation, I usually delete their contact info. Sometimes, if their tirade is bad enough, I'll keep it and just add a little note: "firebunny of death." So that if I run into them again through reintroduction, and I go to add their info and find them again, I can quickly distance myself before a giant tooth of biting metaphor attacks again.

But Facebook? Should I send an email and ask "Who the hell are you and why are we friends?" I don't know if I can do that. This person has access to my pictures and information and social circle. What if he starts to bad mouth me to all my friends and relatives on my page - or his? I could get tagged as a "social forgetter." He could start a "Social Forgetter" group page and I could be featured in it! Other people I forget could join! If it becomes popular, my friends would feel pressure to join!! If it got big enough, he could create a fan page and then go global with his tirade. And then my future interactions with people linked to other friends or social circles could then go something like:

"Hi, I'm Jason. Pleased to meet you. "

Hisses, "Ooooh, yeah. You're the social forgetter. I heard about you. I gotta go."

I mean, cripes, I'd be shot down before I even started! Future socialization would be endangered, and I'm already a social doofus. This would make my life exponentially more difficult, And then what if a prospective employer saw all this?!? I could be turned away for interviews; in the aliases portion of the employment application, I'd have to put "social forgetter." I'd end up being forced to work at McDonald's. Or worse - Arby's! And what then, I ask you?!? what then!?! And what about the CHILDREN?!?

But I digress. I guess what I'm trying to say is, well - what is the right thing to do? Do you think an email is warranted? Maybe this person and I did have an awesome conversation and I really wanted to connect with them, but one or both of us got busy and it fell by the wayside. By deleting him from my friend list, I doubt I'll ever have a chance to recall our sparkling conversation or the person I had it with. They would be consigned to Internet limbo - just bits and bytes left over on a Facebook server somewhere. No face, no name. Just 1's and 0's.

If I hit that "X" next to the person's name in my Facebook list, isn't that pretty final? If I should ever happen to re-meet that person again, and it goes without incident, I could re-add them - but that happens so rarely it would seem. So, should I hit that "X" button? And do I just stop at random strangers? How about ex-boyfriends? Frenemies? Friends of ex-boyfriends and frenemies? Where does it end? And will there be blowback?

Well, on that last question, I want to make one point clear. Yes, there may be blowback. I've heard from people that "dropping" someone as a friend doesn't mean they find out or are notified. Bullshit. Some people - crazy people - notice. They lord over their friend list and keep track of that count. When it goes down, they become like Nancy Drew, tracking down clues until they figure out who deserted them because they weren't "cool enough."

In addition, some people get in touch with you when you randomly drop them as friends - these are crazier people. I had a dude get hold of me on IM the same evening I dropped him as a Facebook friend. It started innocent enough, with "hey I can't see your pictures on Facebook anymore." It ended with something like "LOL. What, you think you're special? Goodluck, asshole." I'm not even sure what "special" meant to him, but I'm assuming that it involved a helmet or a lot of calming medications.

The absolute worst experience I had was when I was at the bar. I saw this person standing there, giving me these smoldering eyes and a smile. I thought he was flirting with me. He seemed pretty nice on the surface, talking to all his friends. So, I started giving him a few glances back here and there, and then smiled at him a couple times. His friends leave him, and he walks over. He says, "You don't remember me, do you?" To which I respond, "No, sorry. Have we met before?"

"Not really, but we talked online and you were my friend on Facebook - until you dropped me."

"Oh, I'm sorry. I must not have recognized you. What's your name?"

"My name? Something you'll never know now. Bye."

Yes, folks. Fire. Bunny. Of. Death.

So, perils await the use of that "X" button in the Facebook friend list - both online and in the real world. But, considering the possible "firebunny of death/social destruction/for the children" scenarios, maybe dropping someone you are unsure you know is for the best. There may have been a reason you didn't keep in touch. A social twinge that the person wasn't quite right. A premonition of future drama and hassle. Or maybe they were just unattractive human beings from the get go.

I'd sure like to know how others deal with such situations, though. That kind of information would be very handy to a social doofus such as myself. Oooh! Or someone should come out with a "Dummy Book!" "How to Deal with Awkward Online Social Situations on Facebook, AIM, and email." It could feature a special section on texting etiquette! Emily Post or Martha Stewart could write it! Now that's a book I would, and I'm sure others would too. I would even feature it on my blog (which no one reads).

And even if it didn't help solve my Facebook problems, maybe Martha could add a gardening section: "Homemade Remedies for Getting Rid of Firerabbits." Yeah. That would be awesome.

If I Were the President...

I won't go into too much of an autopsy on what happened tonight. That the liberal state of Massachusetts just sent a conservative, Tea Party state senator to Ted Kennedy's seat in the U.S. Senate says an awful lot about the amount of political power Barack Obama has at the moment. Head over to RealClearPolitics for a rundown of the coming tearing-to-shreds which the president is about to endure, which may continue until November 3rd, 2010.

But if I were the president, I would make a couple of quick adjustments and start to gird myself for the coming fight. There is a reason why presidents and Congresses don't like to have serious issues to fight on (like health care) during an election year. For both sides, hot button issues are framing issues and wedge issues to be used against incumbent parties holding power. But health care is quickly looking like a solid wedge issue breaking in the Republicans favor, meaning that even in open seats and challenging seats, Democrats might have a hard time. Only those Dems that transcend party status (i.e., Jerry Brown of California) might find success in 2010.

Adjustment 1: pass health care of any kind, immediately. Threaten, cajole, negotiate. Get as much as you can, but whatever you do, hurry up. Either do it before Senator-elect Scott Brown of Massachusetts takes office or have the House pass the Senate version. If this is the last use of positional power you express as president, make it this.

Why? Because if you don't, not only are you a loser in the Bay State, but then you get made out to be a loser on your political agenda. The last year will have little except unpopular policies to run on, and your signature issue can't even be spun by your party pollsters in your favor. Literally, you'll have no record to run on. And, while that may seem fine in an okay economic environment, people without jobs expect results. And there are a lot of people without jobs out there.

Adjustment 2: after health care, start working with Republicans. You might not get much this year, but it can lessen the damage of 2010. The fact is that the partisan attitude, by both Democrats and Republicans, is poisonous. Continuing it and believing that 2008 was a mandate for strong Democratic rule was a misstep. At this moment, people are crying out for bipartisanship - even if only for a few months between the ever growing media-driven election cycles.

Start working with moderate Republicans on a regular basis, and pick your issues with conservatives. Make a show of listening to all sides. And then hope that people start to notice before 2012.

Finally, Adjustment 3: do not isolate Barack Obama. Lately, it would seem the president has become a little G.W. Bush in his belief that he was chosen by the people (not god) to lead. And that his mandate to lead alone provides him enough credibility to simply push things through without explanation or listening. Barack Obama has to be a leader by consensus, and not by force. People elected a person thinking he would unify, and guide, and lead. Instead, they have found a largely hands-off president, unsure of when to directly intervene and allowing big political decisions to be made by his hired hands. President Obama is a smooth guy, and trusting his instincts and intellect in this situation might be wise. Take it easy and keep things smooth. That's the way forward. Stay front and center, and bring people together. That's what people elected in 2008. As cliche as it sounds, people still want a "uniter, and not a divider."

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Quote of the Week

From Facebook and my ever sexy friend Colin G....a Quote of the Week.

Jason's Status Headline today: "All it takes is me even THINKING about taking the bus for one to just roll right by my front door, leaving me behind."

Colin's Response? "The same as it is with men."

Thanks, Colin, for that uplifting and heart-warming response. And, folks, this is from a guy WITH a boyfriend. Yikes! :)

Massachusetts

Just a reminder to all that the special election to fill the seat vacated by Senator Edward M. Kennedy is today. This is a very important election, as it will be both an early indicator of what 2010 will look like for the Democrats, and whether or not the next year will be productive at all in terms of legislative production. If the Repubs get 41 votes, you can be sure that production will either slow way down because Dems will refuse to compromise, or speed up because they realize they can't work any other way.

Check out RealClearPolitics for all the latest info and metrics.

Back to work for me.

Monday, January 18, 2010

A Poignant Retelling and Reposting on the Death of Freddie Mercury

I was watching "Family Guy" tonight, when a conversation between Brian and Peter referenced Freddie Mercury. To be perfectly frank, I didn't know a whole lot about Mr. Mercury, except that he was the lead singer of Queen with a pretty powerful (falsetto?) voice. I did vaguely know that he was exceptionally flamboyant, supposedly gay, and one of the prophets of Glam Rock in the 70's and 80's along with Bowie and the like. Just from what I remember of him and what he looks like, it is obvious that singers today such as Lady Gaga and (obviously) Adam Lambert draw many musical and fashion cues from Mercury.

So, as happens quite often when I hear a pop culture reference, I took to the Internet to do a little itch-scratching (what I call it when I just NEED to know something right now, but it really wouldn't kill me to wait). I ended up in a bit of a Wikipedia loop (that neverending cycle where you click links in a Wiki page to related branch subjects). Of course, I learned all about the controversial life (and death) of Freddie Mercury.

Returning to Google, though, I also found this - a rare retelling of his last moments. It's poignant, and clearly true - the editing is too poor for a cut-and-paste from a book, and too much like a spoken history to be false. It was posted to Freddie Mercury's Find-A-Death page by Anita, who I think was Brian May's wife or some such. This probably is just someone's pseudonym, and the story was (I suspect) found somewhere and reposted from Jim Hutton, his partner of many years who passed away just recently. Normally, I should just point a link to Find-A-Death, but I feel like that site is just a little too morbid to start linking to. If I do more often, I'll start pointing links. But for now, I'll just repost and link below.

This will be a story sounding either like it's "foreign-or-fiction" for many reading this. The period of the late 80's and early 90's that this retells is a time of fear and shame surrounding AIDS for those afflicted with it and those who loved them. It was also a time of uncertainty about how famous people - like countless others throughout the world - should handle what would eventually become an obvious and public battle with the deadly disease. AIDS physical toll on the human body during this period were obvious, causing physical wasting, Kaposi's Sarcoma (a type of cancer), and numerous other ailments with visual manifestations. For many during this period, it was a choice of hiding at home and waiting to die, or being forced "out" as the disease turned one into a shell of their former selves. Regardless of how one chose to confront the disease - whether publicly or privately - a day of reckoning for a person with the disease and those around them always came.

In addition, this was a time when being gay was closely associated with having AIDS (not HIV). In the early days, AIDS was known as Gay Related Immune Disease, or GRID. Another early moniker was Gay Cancer, likely a result of the K.S. lesions which would become associated with AIDS. The fact that the gay male community was the hardest hit by the disease did link AIDS, HIV and gay as nearly synonymous terms in perpetuity. And, as horrible a wake-up call as AIDS was, it turned the LGBT communities push for justice, liberation, and equal protection from one of quiet desperation to an increasingly vocal fight for its very existence. No longer was it good enough to just stay in the closet. To do so meant allowing powerful groups to marginalize the gay community and allow AIDS to be branded as a punishment, rather than a disease which cared nothing for which demographic group it infected. To do so meant that taxpayer dollars for research and treatment could also be branded as a "condoning" of a sinful lifestyle that, in turn, will be solved by allowing AIDS to run its course. To do so, even if you yourself did not have the disease, meant that you allowed it to be turned into a wedge issue - a way to brand people like yourself as immoral and worthy of death. And, unless one was uninfected and chose to remain perfectly abstinent during this period, there could be no guarantee that you would not become infected - so to do so meant to run the risk of allowing yourself to be condemned later as well.

As a result of this convergence between AIDS, HIV, and a new political and cultural push by the LGBT community, there was also a more communal push among friends and loved ones within the community on a smaller level to care for those dying. This was necessary, as the alternative for those with family who were unwilling or unable to help was Hospice care, an unceremonious death in a hospital, or worse. Groups of friends took on the characteristics of families, as a loved one began to fade and eventually pass on. Friends would stay with friends as they lay sick and dying in their beds, while a lover was away at work or rested for a few hours. Lovers would devote most of their time to feeding, caring for, and easing the pain of their partners - all while being sick themselves. Often, it was the one who was less sick at that moment who would be charged with caring for the other. Traditional family links were often torn asunder, with some unable to get past the stigma of homosexuality and AIDS to attend to their sibling or child's last moments, while friends stepped into the role of sister/brother, mother/father, and, finally, family member of record.

This reshuffling of the roles of friends with family was necessary in many cases, and the small communities centered around caretaking at the time (and shown in the retelling of Garden Lodge at Mercury's death) were not uncommon - and not just for the pragmatic reasons surrounding shame of homosexuality and AIDS. In times of pain and tragedy, human beings take solace in social circles. It helped stave off the fear and uncertainty of what will happen once a loved one is gone; it helped them forget that they were just one more person gone that made them closer to being the last one left standing. Though many of the things they told each other during the time just before, during, and after a death - jokes they made, cliches they used, decisions they took - were either delusions or outright falsehoods, they helped ease the pain of the passing until the next person became ill and they had to do it all over again. Indeed, sometimes death isn't about the person dying, but more about how we find a way to get through it ourselves.

I don't plan on commenting on the story at the end, as it stands well enough on its own. And, of course, times have changed considerably. Instead of talking about AIDS, we talk about other issues now facing our community which I will not get into at the moment. AIDS, while still present, has become a relic of another time. And, like all relics, the lessons it can teach slowly loses a dimension of its power: the one it can muster from the context of its time.

I will say this, though: while the story is a bit sad, and clearly of another surreal time, it is also uplifting. It does tell of a time when the party was coming to an end. Seriousness mixed with a freedom that comes with having nothing to lose was setting in, and "the Tribe" which formed the bonds of today's popular gay culture was just forming for the coming fight. But, to each generation of gay men more and more removed from that period, I implore that its a time worth learning about - if only for the stories you can keep close to your heart. Stories of friends who became families; of romantic and loving partnerships strengthened through adversity. Stories of living, loving, laughing, fighting, and dying as people coped - like Mr. Hubbard's story on Mr. Mercury. Where the coming fight for survival then forged the early bonds of a gay subculture, these stories color who we are today. They helped make us the funny, sardonic, exuberant, passionate, stubborn group we are today - even if we today don't know where these qualities came from.

Beyond our mechanisms and ability to cope, we can see more from those times. The stories show what we, as gay men, were then capable of an uncommon power. When abandoned, we banded together. When facing our own mortality, we were brave. As gay men, when we steadfastly cared for our chosen family or partner at their weakest is when our real strength and integrity shined through. At that moment, whether we were the ones dying or the ones living, is when love and determination informed our every move. It gave us the strength to lift a broken body, the strength to let one go, and then the ability to move forward. At that moment, and in that time, strength, tenderness, and compassion gave us power.

But love led the way.

I wonder if it still can. Anyway, onto the story, from Anita:

"We swept to Wembley in the back of one of a fleet of black limousines. I was on my way to see Queen perform live on stage for the very first time. We arrived at Wembley with about an hour to spare. The special enclosure was awash with the country's greatest rock performers. I was agog.

Freddie went to get ready. Queen would be appearing after David Bowie, who was on stage now. When David Bowie came off and headed into his own trailer, Freddie whisked after him, taking me with him. David was strange. He was sitting in front of an electric fan, trying to dry his hair.

"It's about the only fan you've got David, isn't it?" quipped Freddie. They laughed. Then Freddie said: "This is Jim. I believe you've already met."
David glanced up at me and looked blank: "No, I don't know him at all."
"Well who did your hair the other night?" I said, but I don't think it registered. Very strange.

When it was time for Queen to go on, I walked with Freddie to the stage and, watching from the wings, witnessed the most magical 20 minutes of my life. At last I had seen the real Freddie Mercury at work, whipping 70,000 people into a frenzy. He gave everything to his performance; nothing else mattered to him. When he came off, he rushed to his trailer and I tottered behind like a puppy. His first words were: "Thank God that's over!"

Joe ripped his wet clothes from him and dressed him. Adrenalin still overflowing, Freddie knocked back a large vodka to calm himself. Then his face lit up. The expression said: "Yes, we've done it!"

As we stepped out of the caravan we met a grinning Elton John. "You bastards!" he said to Freddie. "You stole the show!" Everyone backstage was converging on Freddie, Brian, Roger and John. Organiser Bob Geldof said later: "Queen were simply the best band of the day."

When we fell into bed that night, Freddie cuddled up and whispered: "Did you enjoy it?"
"What do you think?" I answered, hugging him tight. "It's the first time I've ever been to a concert."
"You're joking!" he said.
"No," I added. He was dumbfounded. I fell asleep knowing that for the first time I'd actually seen the real star Freddie Mercury doing what he did best - wowing the world.

The next morning Live Aid seemed an age away to Freddie, but not to me. When I got to the Savoy on Monday morning it was still bursting out of my ears.

I was soon back in the old routine. Every two weeks I would fly to Munich and be met at the airport. The first time after Live Aid I flew to Munich to join Freddie and was whisked direct to the Musicland studio, to watch him working on material for Queen's new album, A Kind Of Magic. In the studio Freddie had a one-track mind - work, work and more work. I watched him through the glass, but he rarely glanced my way because he was so totally absorbed. He chain-smoked or, rather, chain-lit Silk Cuts, and to boost his energy and adrenalin he slipped down slugs of vodka.

Freddie's drive amazed me. He had to keep on the go; it was part of his life blood. When he wasn't singing he'd bounce into the control room and sit behind the banks of sliders to tweak the playback mixes himself. He was always in total control.

By those happy days, the relationship between Freddie and me had deepened. I came to miss him when we were apart; I became upset. And Freddie felt the same way about me. then one weekend in London he started talking about living our lives together.

"If I asked you to come and live with me in Munich, would you?" he asked. I'd never even considered moving in with Freddie until that moment.
"Yes, I will," I said, adding, "on one condition. If I move to Germany I must have a job." I had financial commitments in Britain, and wasn't prepared to throw in my job at the Savoy to scour Munich for a job as a hairdresser who couldn't even speak German. My independence was important to me, and I wasn't prepared simply to live out of Freddie's pocket.

Freddie let the matter drop. then, 15 minutes later, he said: "And if I decide to leave Munich and come back to London?"
"Then I would consider what I wanted to do," I answered.

In the end, there wasn't much time for consideration. Over a period of weeks Freddie took to phoning most nights at three or four in the morning. Eventually my landlady got so fed up with it she gave me two weeks notice. Freddie's persistence had made me homeless. When Freddie came back to London I told him I was being evicted.

"I'm being kicked out because of your late-night calls," I said.
"Well, don't worry about it," he said calmly. "Move into Garden Lodge. There's no one there - it's empty." So I did.

I spent my first night in the large master bedroom alone, with Oscar snuggling up on top of the massive bed. I hung up a few shirts and my suit for work, but otherwise I didn't unpack as I didn't know where to put my things. Freddie returned to Britain for good the following weekend. and immediately dragged me off to bed. He said he had missed me terribly; I knew he meant it. After he had picked out wardrobes for me to use in the dressing area, he cleared all his things from one of his drawers.
"That's for your little bits and pieces."

So that's how I came to move in with him. We lived together for the next six years like man and wife.

When Freddie and I were in private he could be particularly romantic. We never once broached the subject of how long we'd be together. We just accepted that we were and would be. Occasionally he'd ask me what I wanted out of life. "Contentment and to be loved," I'd reply. It seemed like I'd found both in Freddie.

Another thing he'd often tell me, right up until the night he died, was: "I love you." And it was never an "I love you" which just rolled off the tongue; he always meant it.

I didn't find it so easy to show emotion. I'd lived on the London gay scene for many years and had come to realise you can get hurt very easily when relationships end. Each finished relationship builds up a new barrier and they become difficult to break down. But, in time, Freddie tore them all down.

I think we both shared a fear of the same thing - loneliness. You can have all the friends in the world around you, yet still feel agonisingly lonely, as Freddie said time and again. We were both acutely aware that many of our gay friends were haunted by the prospect of living out their lives alone, unwanted and unloved.

Friday, July 11 and Saturday July 12 were milestones in Queen's career - two sell-out concerts at Wembley Stadium as part of their Magic! European Tour. It was the band's first time back on the massive stage since their show-stealing Live Aid set a year earlier, and over the two nights 150,000 people would see them.

Freddie had recurring problems with nodules on his vocal cords, the price he paid for being a singer. That meant he toured with a small machine, a steam inhaler in which he firmly believed. He also sucked Strepsils throat lozenges all the time. On the first night of Wembley Freddie had some throat problems, but dismissed them as not drastic enough to stop the show. As always, I watched from all over Wembley on both nights.

The after-show party on Saturday was held at the Roof Gardens Club in Kensington and, because the press would be there, Freddie wanted Mary Austin, the company secretary of Freddie's private business, Goose Productions, which managed all his personal affairs, on his arm. It was a rare deceit that he was not in love with me and he apologised for it.
"It's got to be this way because of the press," he said.
I understood, and followed a few paces behind them.

A few weeks later, I read a feature about Freddie in the Daily Express. It reported Freddie's response to Mary's desire to have a baby by him: he would sooner have another cat. The feature also reported that Freddie was unattached.

Freddie felt that keeping to this line made things simpler for the two of us, and he was right. However, he did say in the article: "For the first time I've found a contentment within myself." He told me he was referring to our relationship.

Freddie felt Mary had long since become a public part of his life in the papers and knew she could deal with it easily enough. But he always tried to shield me from the press. He looked on fame as a double-edged sword.

After work on Friday, August 1, I flew to Barcelona to join Freddie on tour. He told me he'd been interviewed by Spanish television and declared cheekily that the main reason he was in Spain was in the hope of meeting their great opera diva, Montserrat Caballe. After the Barcelona concert we all went out to a fabulous fish restaurant. At one point I asked Roger Taylor how the tour was going.

"Well, Freddie's different this year," he said. "What have you done to him?"

He told me Freddie was a decidedly changed man. He'd stopped trawling the gay venues while the others went back to their hotel, and he'd stopped burning the candle at both ends. Roger's comment spoke volumes. I took it as a reassuring nod of approval which was very much appreciated. Coming from one of Freddie's closest friends, and one of the band, I saw it as a vote of confidence in our affair.

When the tour was over, we went on holiday to Japan. On our return, when we had cleared customs, we were ambushed from a Fleet Street reporter and photographer gleefully throwing into Freddie's face and Aids-scare story. Under the headline "Queen Star Freddie In Aids Shock" the News Of The World had alleged that Freddie had been "secretly tested for Aids" by a Harley Street clinic under his real name Freddie Bulsara. The results had shown conclusively, according to a bogus spokesman for Freddie, that he did not have the "killer disease". The tasteless story was a flyer - rubbish from start to finish. It even closed by claiming that Freddie and Mary were living together in Garden Lodge.

Freddie flipped. Why had no one from the Queen office in London raised the alarm and alerted him to the story?
"Do I look like I'm dying from Aids?" Freddie told the reporter. He said he had no idea what anyone had been saying and was clearly annoyed at what he called "such rubbish".
"It makes me feel sick," he said. "Now go away and leave me alone."
"Do I Look Like I'm Dying From Aids? Fumes Freddie," screamed the headline from the Sun on the next day. He was furious.

He said he hadn't been tested, as the papers had suggested, but the story did make him very edgy. He was clearly on his guard and for the next few days he seemed preoccupied with the story. Usually Freddie ignored any press speculation, but this time the press seemed to have struck a nerve. I guess that he had doubts about his own health, as before we met he'd done more than his fair share of living the fast-lane life of a successful rock star; all sex, drugs and rock and roll, with a string of one-night stand strangers.

The day the Sun ran the story I went back to work at the Savoy, to my humdrum routine at the barber's shop. The day didn't go well. I learned, to my horror, that the concession had been sold. I met the new owner, but wasn't very impressed with him and was even less so when he appointed his brash little brother as manager. Life at the Savoy began to get rocky. The new management tried to change the business from an old-fashioned gentlemen's barber shop into a trendy cut and blow-dry place. My life at work was fast becoming unbearable, but at least I had Freddie and Garden Lodge to come home to.

For Christmas that year, Queen had agreed to release an album of live versions of many of their hits, called Live Magic. They had also agreed to take the best part of a year off to give them each a chance to recharge their batteries as well as pursue solo projects. With so much time suddenly on his hands I thought Freddie would want to go clubbing, but quite the opposite happened. Like me, he became a stay-at-home. We began to lead a very quiet life together at Garden Lodge. Most Saturday evenings Phoebe and Joe went out and left the two of us cuddled up on the sofa watching television. Some nights we'd even be in bed by 10pm, though that never meant Freddie got up any earlier the following morning.

At the end of February, Freddie flew to Barcelona with Phoebe and record producer Mike Moran to meet Montserrat Caballe for the first time - when Freddie had made his remark on Spanish television she'd been watching and had arranged to meet him. The two great singers met in a private dining room at the Ritz Hotel. Freddie said he'd had absolutely no idea what to expect except that Montserrat was prone to tantrums. She turned up late, and Freddie introduced himself by handing her a cassette and spluttering: "Here, I've got this for you to listen to." On the tape was Exercises in Free Love, a song he'd written with Mike Moran. Montserrat liked the demo tracks and said she would be happy to work on an album with Freddie. He came home on cloud nine.

A week later Freddie and I were off to Covent Garden to hear a recital by Montsy, as Freddie called her. At the end of the performance, for an encore, she came on accompanied by Mike Moran. She announced she was going to sing a song "written by two great new friends of mine," adding, "and I believe the other is in the audience tonight".

Freddie was really surprised. His hands shot up to his eyes and he started laughing, with an expression of total astonishment on his face. The spotlights swung on Freddie, his face cupped in his hands, and the audience rose to their feet clapping wildly. So Freddie stood up and acknowledged the applause, and sank back into his chair. He listened transfixed as Montsy performed Exercises in Free Love.

Later that week, when Montsy arrived in the studio to work with Freddie, things didn't go quite the way she expected. She thought that to record with Freddie she only had to fly in, sing a few songs from sheet music and leave, but she hadn't reckoned on Freddie's unique way of working. He hadn't written out any of the music for her in advance. Instead he was going to ask her to try something, then keep reworking it until they found the exact effect he was after.

He told her: "Puccini and all these other composers are dead. I'm alive dear."

With that, she accepted his odd way of recording. He proved a hard taskmaster. Later she admitted that in those sessions Freddie got more out of her voice than she knew she was capable of.

Before Easter I went home to Ireland to visit my family. I'm sure my family suspected I was gay, although I'd never said anything and I never mentioned I was Freddie's lover. I stayed with my mum, who didn't have a phone, so it meant I had to walk four miles to the nearest phone-box to ring Freddie. The day before I was due to fly back I rang Freddie at home. He asked when I'd be back, and there was an urgency in his voice which made me suspect something was wrong.
"The doctors have just taken a big lump out of me," he replied. I asked him to tell me more, but he said he couldn't over the phone; he'd tell me when I got home.
"Well, don't worry," I said. "I'll be home tomorrow." My immediate reaction was that Freddie was exaggerating a little. If he was feeling low, he had a habit of wounding dramatic over the phone to win extra attention from me.

Next day, when I got back to Garden Lodge, Freddie was in our bedroom. As I lay in bed with my arm around him, Freddie cuddled up close and told me what he couldn't tell me the previous day.

He pointed to a tiny mark on his shoulder, no bigger than a thumbnail and with two tiny stitches in it. The doctors had taken a piece of his flesh for testing and the results had just come back. He had Aids.
"Don't be ridiculous," I said. I couldn't believe it: the doctors had to be wrong.
"Who did this test?" I asked. "Come on, we'll go to somebody else." We had to get a second opinion.
"no," said Freddie. "These guys are the best available."
"If you want to leave me I'll understand," he said.
"What?" I asked.
"If you want to leave me and move out of Garden Lodge I won't stop you; I'll understand," he said.
"But I love you," I said. "I'm not going to walk out on you now or ever. Let's not talk about it any more."
Freddie looked up at me and we hugged very tightly. The consequences of what he'd just told me never really sank in. It was something I was never prepared for, nor had any idea how to deal with. Instead I tried to put it out of my mind as much as possible.
In many ways I was still hoping for a miracle: a mis-diagnosis. Apart from ensuring our sex was safe from then on, I wasn't worried about my own health for a moment. Freddie suggested several times that I had and Aids test myself, but I wouldn't, nor would I give him a reason for my decision.

The truth was that I couldn't see what good my having a test could do. If I was HIV positive, I thought there was a real possibility that Freddie might suffer some kind of guilt as in all probability he'd have given it to me. If the test proved negative and I was in the clear, I felt that it would be equally unfair on Freddie, like saying, "Yah boo, sucks. I'm all right jack!" The only thing that mattered was looking after Freddie and trying to keep him healthy.

That was the last time we referred directly to his illness and from that moment, if anything came up on television to do with Aids, we would turn over to another channel or switch the set off. It's not that he was unsympathetic to others with the illness; he simply didn't like being reminded of his own fate.

On May 4, Freddie was devastated by another story about him in the Sun. And so was I. His old friend, Paul Prenter had stitched him up. Aids Kills Freddie's Two Lovers, it declared, and the story was run across three pages. Tony Bastin, from Brighton, and John Murphy, an airline steward, had died from the disease in 1986. And Prenter claimed that Freddie had called him late one night and poured out his fears about Aids.

The feature also named me as his lover. My immediate thoughts were of what my family back home in Ireland would make of it. I was due back for a visit, and if word was out that I was the lover of someone so famous they would certainly be disappointed to hear it third-hand from the press. It was something I'd have preferred to tell them in my own time.

We later learned that Prenter had been paid about £32,000 by the paper for his story. Freddie never spoke to him again. For the next few days there was more in the Sun, and at each episode of Prenter's story Freddie became angrier. Prenter sold the paper several photographs of Freddie with various lovers and these were thrown over two pages under the heading All The Queen's Men.

A few times after the Sun sell-out, Prenter rang Garden Lodge, but Freddie wouldn't speak to him. Prenter tried to excuse his appalling behaviour by saying that the press had been hounding him for so many weeks he'd finally cracked under the pressure. Freddie didn't want to know Prenter's excuses; he felt unforgivably let down. The saddest thing about the Prenter episode was that it crushed Freddie's ability to trust others, except for a select few. He made no new friends after that.

I often felt sorry for Freddie. For all he had - the money and the success - he couldn't walk down a street or go shopping without being stared at, a pet hate of his.

Feeling bruised by Prenter and the Sun., Freddie decided that he needed to get well away from them both and we flew to Ibiza for a weeks holiday. At the end of the trip Freddie and Montserrat Caballe made a surprise appearance at the Ibiza '92 festival to celebrate Spain's staging of the Olympics five years later. The night was wonderfully decadent, held at the lavish Ku Club in San Antonio in front of an elite audience of about 500 people. When Freddie and Montserrat sang Barcelona in public for the very first time, you could feel the pride the song was instilling in them all. Some even shed a few tears.

Back in London, I was beginning to discover I did not have much job security at the Savoy. Things at the barber's shop were coming to a head. I'd started telling some of my regular clients that there was a chance I would be leaving, although I had no idea where I'd go next. By mid-July I'd had enough. When I'd done my last trim of the day I phoned the owner of the shop and asked to see him, but he was too busy. "Fine," I told him. "As of 4.30 this afternoon, I'm finished." He didn't ask me why, but asked whether I could work a month's notice. I said I wouldn't.

I rang Freddie at Garden Lodge to tell him what had happened. "All right, dear" Freddie said calmly. !you start working tomorrow for me in the garden. We'll work your wages out when you get home."

When I got back to Garden Lodge, Freddie was waiting for me. "Give us a cuddle," he said. "Well done! I'm glad you're not going to work there any more." Then we talked about me taking over from the part-time gardeners. I told him I'd work as his gardener on one condition - that no one, not even he, could interfere in what I was doing or the way I worked. It was agreed. Not only that, I even got a wage increase; he put me on £600 a month after tax.

Freddie's condition was soon showing physically. A few large red marks appeared on the back of his hand and on his left cheek. These were Kaposi's Sarcoma. He got the first marks neutralised by special laser treatment, and they faded slowly. But the treatment left slight blemishes, so he wore make-up to cover them up.


It wasn't until the autumn of 1988 on a particularly dank day, that I met for the first time Freddie's parents, Bomi and Jer Bulsara. They came to Garden Lodge to have dinner with their son. I noted a strong physical resemblance to his mother, a little lady with dark, greying hair and a lovely smile.



At the time, the mews and the garden were still a mass of foundation trenches and mounds of earth. I was in the garden and Freddie brought his mum and dad out with him when he brought me a cup of coffee. He had not told them about our affair.

"If they ask you where you sleep, tell them in the Pink Room!" he said.

A few minutes later, as he showed them around the mews, I overheard them asking who I was.

"He's my gardener," Freddie said.

"Where does he live?" they asked.

"He lives here, of course," he replied.

I didn't get to speak to Freddie's parents that day, but I met them many times after that and we always got on well. I would drive Freddie over to their small terraced house in Feltham, Middlesex, to visit them. We'd both sit down with them for tea in the kitchen.

Mrs Bulsara always got the tea at her own pace - she never rushed around. She was very independent and still drove herself everywhere in her little car. the Bulsara home was very homely. Freddie had lived there since the family first came to Britain. (They were originally from Africa, and moved first to India before settling here in 1964.) I don't think they kept a bedroom for him there, nor did they have any photographs of Freddie on display. Freddie had once offered to buy them a bigger house, but they said no. They were clearly very content with what they had.

Freddie's dad was very proud of his garden. One day he took me out to look at it. He had a fabulously shaped eucalyptus tree and many beautiful old roses. When we reached the roses he said, with a hint of regret in his voice, that he was sorry the roses were reaching the end of their natural life. I wondered whether he was telling me he knew that Freddie was reaching the end of his life.

I can't remember Freddie telling his parents that he was ill, but as time went on it was difficult to disguise from them the fact that something was terribly wrong. Freddie's physical appearance was beginning to change and he looked thinner on each visit. Freddie's mum knew he was very ill. I have a feeling Freddie did eventually tell them the truth, but he did not do so in front of any of us.

Freddie went to see his mum every Thursday afternoon for tea, and he rarely came away empty-handed. His mum made wonderful cheese biscuits and packed them into a little lunch-box for him. In fact, in one of the last photographs the newspapers published of Freddie he was outside Garden Lodge with a box of his mum's cheese biscuits under his arm.

On Joe Fannelli's birthday in 1990, he told everyone in Garden Lodge that he had some bad news. He, too, was not well.

"You mean you're HIV?" I asked.

"No," he said. "I've actually got full-blown Aids."

What can you say? I'm sorry? Nothing of any use came into my mind. It would be another blow to contend with in Garden Lodge. We were all worried about what the press would make of it if they discovered that Joe was also ill. We had visions of the sick headlines and guessed our house would be dubbed "Aids Lodge". It all made us more determined than ever to pull together and stay optimistic.

Despite putting a brave face on things for everyone else's benefit at Garden Lodge, privately I began to get very anxious about my own health. I thought I could be HIV positive as well. The more I reluctantly thought about it, the more it seemed likely. So I decided to have and Aids test but to tell no one. I did it in total secrecy under a pseudonym. On the excuse of going to see a friend, I slipped out of Garden Lodge for a day and traveled to Brighton.

Before the doctor would agree to take a blood sample for testing I had to undergo special counseling. The full implications of proving positive were explained to me compassionately. I told them I realised all the cons and wanted to proceed.

That night back at Garden Lodge I found it impossible to sleep. I had told the hospital that I could handle the news if it was going to be bad. But I wasn't so sure in my own mind that I really could. What would I do?

A few days later I rang for the results.

"I'm very sorry, you're positive," said the doctor. But I didn't have full-blown Aids. I was dazed. I didn't tell Freddie. He had enough to cope with; my news could only upset him. I buried myself in work in the garden and workshop and put thoughts of my own future out of my mind. But the thought of it kept coming back to me each night as I struggled to sleep and stop my mind from racing.

Freddie's health continued to deteriorate. He was thin and found it difficult to sleep, so I decided it was better for him if I moved to my own room permanently. Some nights I would still sleep with him, but usually I just lay next to him on top of the bedclothes. He'd snuggle up next to me for comfort. Freddie nicknamed my new bedroom the Ice Box as I slept with the window wide open, even in the middle of winter.

The move also marked the point from which almost all normal sexual relations ended between us. It was clear that sex was no longer a pleasure for him but an exhausting ordeal instead. So we settled for the next best thing: gentle kissing and heart-felt cuddles. Those cuddling sessions would be as rewarding in their way as any sex we ever had.

Freddie's 45th birthday, on September 5, 1991, was perhaps the quietest of his life. He was very aware that he wasn't on top form and that he could no longer disguise the fact that he was coming to the end of his life. He didn't want a huge bash for his friends because he didn't want them to see how sad he looked. The only thing he wanted from anyone for his last birthday was privacy.

In October the band released their single The Show Must Go On, with the B-side Keep Yourself Alive. As Freddie expected, the press weren't slow to report its questioning, haunting lyrics. They speculated on possible hidden meanings in lyrics like "What are we living for? and "I'll soon be turning round the corner now" at a time when he looked so frail. To me, the most autobiographical line was: "My make-up may be flaking but my smile still stays on." That was true. No matter how ill Freddie felt, he never grumbled to anyone or sought sympathy of any kind. It was his battle, no one else's, and he always wore a brave face against the ever-increasing odds against him.

The last video Freddie made was for the single These Are The Days Of Our Lives. (It was released, shortly after his death, on the flip-side of Bohemian Rhapsody.) It seemed a very apt swansong. When Freddie was making the video he looked worse than I had ever seen him. Now the thick make-up he used to disguise the markings on his face only seemed to highlight his gaunt features. The security at the studio was very tight and only the essential technicians were there.

We spent a last holiday in Switzerland, when I finally came to accept that Freddie wasn't going to live much longer. We were in the last few days before the end. One day Freddie and I were watching an old Thirties' movie. The heroine asked her partner: "Will we spend the rest of our lives together?" Freddie looked at me and asked the same thing.

Coming back from Switzerland, Freddie was in good spirits. We'd arranged for him to be sped through customs. In his final few weeks he'd refer to it proudly. "Even Liz Taylor doesn't get away with that, dear!" he'd say.

Of course, Freddie was given special permission to avid the queues at customs and passport control because he was so ill. He tired easily and looked terrible, and it would have been cruel to allow him to attract the attentions of the crowd. None of us were allowed to accompany Freddie and for a while he was split from the rest of us, dependent on total strangers for the first time in years. We tried protesting, but it was no use. We still had to go through immigration like everyone else while poor frail Freddie was left in the Customs Hall to wait for us.

Back at Garden Lodge, Freddie set out on the last three weeks of his life. He remained in good spirits, though he took to his bed for long parts of the day. He didn't once talk about work. Some days he'd get up in the morning and come down in his dressing gown for a cup of tea before returning to his room for the rest of the day. And I'd take him a cup of tea, along with his beloved cats for company.

We kept ourselves sane by doing jobs around the house and still pretending that everything was normal. I got round to putting fairly lights in the second magnolia tree by the corner of the house, but who cared so long as it made Freddie a little happier. I waited until Freddie and I were along in the bedroom before showing him the lights.

"You haven't passed any remark about the tree," I said.

He walked to the window and his face lit up when he saw the tree twinkling.

"Oh, you've done it," he said and hugged me.

Before, he would have responded differently, perhaps snapping sarcastically:

"Why has it taken you so long?" But now he no longer had the strength.

I found solace in working in the garden. I lived for the enjoyment he could get from looking at me and the garden from his window. Right up to the very last day I worked on the garden. Even on the Sunday he died, I mowed the lawn.

I abandoned a planned trip to Ireland as time was so clearly running out for Freddie. In the second week Freddie came off most of his medication except painkillers. It was a decision he took against the advice of his doctors.

Much of the time Freddie slept or watched television. Joe or Phoebe stayed with him through the day, relieved for short breaks by Mary or his old friend Dave Clark. Dave came every day, and we appreciated his help immensely.

Although I was busy working in the garden where he could see me, Freddie needed to hear from me more and more that I loved him. So I got into the habit of flying upstairs and quickly sticking my head around the door.

"Hey," I'd say, "I love you!"

Then I'd run back down to get on with the gardening. I knew it made him feel good for a few minutes at least. Sometimes when I got downstairs again I'd look up at his window and he'd be there waiting for me to emerge outside; then he'd blow me a kiss.

I spent the evenings alone with Freddie. We would talk or watch television, or I would doze alongside him. He'd rest his frail head in the cradle of my arm and I'd gently massage his scalp.

Joe, Phoebe and I also started taking turns to stay with Freddie through the night, usually lying awake next to him on constant stand-by. We had an intercom system installed so we could summon one another, and pagers so we could be reached instantly. We wanted to be with him at the end.

In the last 10 days before Freddie died, the press set up camp outside Garden Lodge. In the early morning one or two would arrive, followed by more as the day went on. After an hour or so there'd be six or seven dozen. Freddie was obviously aware that the press were waiting outside, since you could often hear them from the bedroom. But he never knew to what extent they were there. He thought that at any one time there were no more than a handful and none of us ever corrected him. It wouldn't have helped.

Contrary to some newspaper reports at the time, Freddie's bedroom never became a "mini-hospital". He had a drip-stand at his right-hand side, in case he needed a blood transfusion, but everything else in the room was exactly as it had always been. In the last few days Freddie stopped eating solid foods; he just ate fruit and drank fruit juices.

Mary could say some clumsy things, but perhaps she said them without thinking. One day she suggested that we should ask Freddie to take off the wedding ring that I'd given to him, as when her mother had died her fingers had swollen badly.

"The ring stays on, Mary," I said.

Later, when I was alone with Freddie, I mentioned the idea of slipping the ring off in case his finger should swell up.

"No, he said. "I'm keeping it on." It never came off; he was even cremated with it on.

The morning of Thursday, November 21, was a very sad day for me. It was the last time Freddie appeared at his bedroom window calling "cooee", and I knew that the end was very near.

That night I took special care of him. He dozed and I lay next to him on top of the bed. He only had to elbow me gently and I'd be awake if he wanted anything.

When dawn broke I was already wide awake, quietly watching television. Freddie was still asleep, cuddled inside my arm and holding on to my hand. Every so often he'd softly squeeze it. "Do you love me?" he'd asked when he woke. More than ever he wanted to hear how much he was treasured. "Yes, I love you," I whispered and kissed him on the forehead.

At about 6.30 Freddie needed to go to the loo and I walked alongside to steady him. He sat down to have a pee and I leaned against his shoulder to support him. "You're in the way!" he grumbled, and elbowed me painfully.

"If I move away from here you're going to fall over," I insisted, I got him back to bed where he sat quietly. The rest of that morning he seemed alert and well aware of what was going on. A meeting with his management triggered a flurry of activity to do with Freddie's statement to the press that he was suffering from Aids. I've always been doubtful that Freddie made that statement of his own accord. He'd kept it all quiet for so long it seemed odd that he'd suddenly want to start confessing things as if he had something to be ashamed of. I'm sure he felt his fate should not become a matter for public debate. It was only a matter for him and his immediate friends. And I'm sure he didn't want to risk Joe and me being subjected to the publicity. I did not even know that Freddie was going to issue a statement. But I do know that Freddie specifically requested that the statement was released worldwide to prevent the British gutter press from having a scoop to themselves. It was Freddie's way of saying to those so eagerly awaiting his death: "Fuck the lot of you!"

Freddie dozed through much of the next day, and in the evening I went up to see him. We were lying together on the bed when he asked me what time it was.

"It's eight o'clock," I said.

"Soon the whole world will know," he sighed looking at me with sad, brown eyes. This was the first indication I had that something was going on.

When Freddie nodded off I went downstairs and mentioned what he'd said to Joe. He confirmed that a statement explaining his condition had been prepared. It was due to be released at midnight.

I wasn't supposed to be keeping watch over Freddie through Saturday night - Joe was. But he'd gone out to the gym, then out for a drink, and didn't reappear. I was with Freddie in his room at around 10pm when he got terribly agitated. He kept asking me where Joe had got to.

"Why, what's the problem?" I asked.

"Well, I have to take my medicine."

"Oh, that's not a problem," I answered. "I can give you the pills you want. Which ones are they?" He knew exactly which three or four pills he needed - the painkillers. He had been taking AZT, but had abandoned it along with the rest.

Freddie and I chatted away all night. I don't remember what we wittered to each other about, even when Freddie was well. It was all happy inconsequential stuff. We didn't watch television any more. We just lay on the bed cuddling until he dozed off. And sometimes so did I.

Occasionally he gave me a quick jab in the ribs to stop me snoring, or a harder one if he needed something. Then he asked me to prepare some fruit for him in the kitchen. I sliced some mango and added a little sorbet to help fight his chronic dehydration.

We drifted asleep again. When Freddie next woke me it was about three and he seemed incapable of explaining himself. He couldn't talk properly and kept pointing to his mouth frowning. Something was terribly wrong. I tried to work out what he wanted, but couldn't. About half an hour later Joe came back home and saw I was having problems. As soon as Freddie spotted Joe, he pointed to his mouth.

Joe leaned over Freddie and opened his mouth. A piece of mango had lodged at the back of his throat which he could neither swallow nor bring back up. Joe prised Freddie's jaw open wide and flicked out the offending piece of fruit with his finger. Freddie didn't say anything. Joe and I were fully aware that a healthy Freddie would have been furious with me for not understanding. He sipped some juice, then went back to sleep.

Freddie woke up again at six in the morning and uttered what were to be his last two words: "Pee, Pee" He wanted to be helped to the loo. he looked terribly weak and I had to carry him. As I lowered him back on to the bed I heard a deafening crack. It sounded like one of Freddie's bones breaking, cracking like the branch of a tree. He screamed out in pain and went into a convulsion.

I yelled for Joe. I needed him to pin Freddie to the bed to stop him injuring himself. Over the years, Joe had seen Freddie have one anxiety attack after another and he knew just how to handle him - by pinning him down until the anxiety had passed. He said: "Freddie, calm down." Then Freddie's hand shot up and went straight for Joe's throat. He was like a drowning man clutching for air.

Joe freed himself from Freddie's grip and eventually he calmed him down. Then, exhausted by the strain, Freddie promptly fell asleep. We phoned Dr Atkinson, and he came over and gave Freddie an injection of morphine to help him through the day. Joe later told me Freddie was allergic to morphine, but it was now so late in the day it didn't seem to matter.

Mary came by later in the morning and we all stood around in the kitchen, waiting to hear Dr Atkinson's prognosis. He said: "Freddie will probably last until Thursday."

Joe and I looked at each other. We both knew that there was no way Freddie could last that long.

Mary left shortly after that. The rest of that day Freddie nodded in and out of sleep. I felt the need to get well away from Garden Lodge, so that afternoon I took myself off to Holland Park where I moped around for an hour.

By the time I got back, Freddie was as ill as I'd ever seen him. He seemed to know what was going on around him, but couldn't respond to any of it; he could hear, but couldn't move his eyes to acknowledge he'd heard. He just stared straight ahead, eyes glazed.

Dr Atkinson stayed at the house all afternoon and left just after 6.30pm. I thanked him for having stayed so long, saw him out, and then went straight back to be with Freddie. Freddie made clear he wanted to go to the loo. After the terrible convulsions which had followed his morning visit to the bathroom, I wasn't bold enough to try to cope with him again single-handed. I flew downstairs and found Phoebe.

By the time we got back upstairs, Freddie had wet the bed.

Phoebe looked over at me and asked:

"Shall we change the bedclothes?"

"We'd better," I answered, "If we don't and he wakes up he'll go absolutely apeshit." I don't know why I said that; perhaps it was my subconscious trying to make out that things were less serious than they were.

Phoebe started changing the bed while I took care of Freddie. As I was changing Freddie into a clean T-shirt and pair of boxer shorts, I felt him try to raise his left leg to help a little. It was the last thing he did. I looked down at him, knowing he was dead.

"Phoebe," I cried. "I'm sorry, he's gone."

I slipped my arm under Freddie's neck, kissed him and then held him. His eyes were still open. I can remember the expression on his face - and when I go to sleep every night it's still there in front of me. He looked radiant.

One minute he was a boy with a gaunt, sad little face and the next he was a picture of ecstasy. Freddie's whole face went back to everything it had been before. He looked finally and totally at peace. Seeing him like that made me happy in my sadness. I felt an overwhelming sense of relief. I knew that he was no longer in pain.

I stopped the tiny fly-wheel of the wind-up carriage clock by the bed. I'd given it to Freddie because he told me he'd always wanted one. It read 12 minutes past seven. I've never started it again."

Link to this Story.

I stood there for several minutes by myself...

So, there are only a few things in this world that just tick me off. One of them is rudeness and the other is poor service. Combine both together, and you get me quite pissy. This guy does both.

He does say "hello" when I come in, but then puts his nose back into his ordering paperwork. I look at the menu and then realize, for 4 minutes, he has yet to ask me what I'd like. He just stands there, face down, until the cook from the back notices (that's her in the picture) and yells something. He lies that "I asked him what he wants," and then stands at the register. I order a gyro platter with a Diet Coke and pay (a rather inflated) the price.

The guy doesn't say thank you, scurries to the back, and when he comes back, doesn't give me my Coke. Instead, he puts his nose back in the ordering paperwork.

When the lady comes out with my food in a bag for takeout, I tell her "I'm eating in, you could have saved the bag." She says she didn't know. I say "And I didn't get my Diet Coke." She gets it for me, but of course, doofus isn't there to observe someone else doing his job.

Hopefully, he was just having a bad morning - but I don't think so. On three previous occasions have I come in here and then left because people were standing at the counter and either ignored or didn't see me or didn't acknowledge me. I don't like eating in places like this. In this competitive economic environment, especially for restaurants in SqHill, I feel like its asking to lose business and build a bad reputation. Hence, this blog entry.

But what's worse is that I fear this gentleman is a manager. If so, this business is in trouble because I can see where the employees are learning their customer greeting skills. He's combined two of my least-favorite social faux pas: ignoring me and bad service. The bad service, therefore, is not worth the money and the food (which I am eating now) is nothing special. Too bad.

My verdict? Head down to Aiello's or the Greek Marketplace. The prices and food are better, and the service is zipzap. In the meantime, I am establishing a rule for my blog: I will do no harm by outright naming the establishment described in this blog, or any others I have a negative experience at. But I will give enough of a rough descriptor and a picture with no logo's so that if someone is truly set on avoiding it, they can (with a little deductive reasoning).

And hopefully the establishment will see the bad blog post and take it upon themselves to change it up a bit - I hope. If I stop in and it looks like they have changed or I hear they have improved from others, I'll return. Until then, I will not be spending money at the restaurant with an "Envious" neighbor across the street with the red dining room.

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Homo Twinkiferous

The Homo Twinkiferous - shown here angry and wet and about to pounce, like his close relation, the gay male housecat. This particular specimen does not belong to me. I personally believe twinks should be kept in the wild, where they can roam free and pee where they want. Nope, this one belongs to a friend. Mine would be clearly tagged, wearing a collar, and have all his shots.

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

When sharing a room...

...make sure the lock on the bathroom door works, or be sure to stay silent while sharing the shower with a friend. Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile